RESNA Annual Conference - 2020

Effect Of Seat Height On Manual Wheelchair Foot Propulsion While Wheeling Forward On A Smooth Level Surface: A Repeated-Measures Crossover Study

Nathaniel D. Heinrichs1, R. Lee Kirby1, Cher Smith2, Kristin F.J. Russell2, Christopher J. Theriault3, Steve P. Doucette3

1 Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Department of Medicine, Dalhousie University, 2 Department of Occupational Therapy, and 3 Research Methods Unit, Nova Scotia Health Authority, Halifax, NS, Canada

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To test the hypotheses that, during manual-wheelchair foot propulsion forward on smooth level surfaces, lowering the seat height increases speed, push frequency and push effectiveness, and decreases perceived difficulty.

Methods: In a repeated-measures crossover study, 50 able-bodied participants used one foot to propel a manual wheelchair 10 m on a smooth level surface at 5 seat heights, in random order, ranging from 5.08 cm below to about 5.08 cm above lower-leg length ("neutral"). We recorded Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) capacity scores and used the Wheelchair Propulsion Test (WPT) to calculate speed (m/s), push frequency (cycles/s) and push effectiveness (m/cycle). We also recorded the participants' perceived difficulty (0-4) and video-recorded each trial.

Results: WST capacity scores were reduced at the higher seat heights. Using repeated-measures models (adjusted for age and sex), there were negative relationships between seat height and speed (p <0.0001) and push effectiveness (p <0.0001). Lowering the seat height by 5.08 cm from "neutral" corresponded to improvements in speed of 0.20 m/s and in push effectiveness of 0.20 m/cycle. The trend for push frequency was also significant (p = 0.003) but the effect size was smaller. Perceived difficulty increased with seat height (p < 0.001). The video-recordings provided qualitative kinematic data regarding the seated "gait cycles".

Conclusions: During manual-wheelchair foot propulsion forward on smooth level surfaces, lowering the seat height increases speed and push effectiveness, and decreases perceived difficulty.

INTRODUCTION

For people who use wheelchairs for mobility, seat height can affect the biomechanics of two-hand propulsion (e.g. by people with paraplegia), a subject that has been extensively studied.[1-8] Manual wheelchairs can also be self-propelled with one or both feet. For instance, many people with hemiplegia propel themselves using their sound-side arms and legs ("hemiplegic-pattern propulsion") [9-11] and many frail elderly people or those with central-cord syndrome propel their wheelchairs with both feet.[12]

The primary objectives of this study were to test the hypotheses that, during manual-wheelchair foot propulsion forward on smooth level surfaces, lowering the seat height increases speed, push frequency and push effectiveness, and decreases perceived difficulty. Our secondary objective was to quantify the extent of these effects.

METHODS

In a repeated-measures crossover study, 50 able-bodied participants used one foot to propel a manual wheelchair 10 m on a smooth level surface at 5 seat heights, in random order, ranging from 5.08 cm below to about 5.08 cm above lower-leg length ("neutral"). We recorded Wheelchair Skills Test (WST) capacity scores and used the Wheelchair Propulsion Test (WPT) to calculate speed (m/s), push frequency (cycles/s) and push effectiveness (m/cycle). We also recorded the participants' perceived difficulty (0-4) and video-recorded each trial.

RESULTS

WST capacity scores were reduced at the higher seat heights. Using repeated-measures models (adjusted for age and sex), there were negative relationships between seat height and speed (p <0.0001) and push effectiveness (p <0.0001). Lowering the seat height by 5.08 cm from "neutral" corresponded to improvements in speed of 0.20 m/s and in push effectiveness of 0.20 m/cycle. The trend for push frequency was also significant (p = 0.003) but the effect size was smaller. Perceived difficulty increased with seat height (p < 0.001). The video-recordings provided qualitative kinematic data regarding the seated "gait cycles".

CONCLUSIONS

During manual-wheelchair foot propulsion forward on smooth level surfaces, lowering the seat height increases speed and push effectiveness, and decreases perceived difficulty.

REFERENCES

  1. Masse LC, Lamontagne M, O'Riain MD. Biomechanical analysis of wheelchair propulsion for various seating positions. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1992;29:12-28.
  2. van der Woude LHV, Veeger DJ, Rozendal RH. Seat height in handrim wheelchair propulsion. J Rehabil Res Dev. 1989;26:31-50.
  3. van der Slikke RMA, de Witte AMH, Berger MAM, Bregman DJJ, Veeger DJHEJ. Wheelchair mobility performance enhancement by changing wheelchair properties: what is the effect of grip, seat height, and mass? Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2018;13:1050-8.
  4. Kotajarvi BR, Sabick MB, An K-N, Zhao KD. The effect of seat position on wheelchair propulsion biomechanics. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2004;41:403-14.
  5. Gorce P, Louis N. Wheelchair propulsion kinematics in beginners and expert users: influence of wheelchair settings. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2012;27:7-15.
  6. van der Woude LH, Bouw A, van Wegen J, van As H, Veeger D, de Groot S. Seat height: effects on submaximal hand rim wheelchair performance during spinal cord injury rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:143-9.
  7. Wei SH, Huang S, Jiang CJ, Chiu JC. Wrist kinematic characterization of wheelchair propulsion in various seating positions: implication to wrist pain. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). 2003;18:S46-52.
  8. Lee SY, Kim SC, Lee MH. Effect of wheelchair seat height on shoulder and forearm muscle activities during wheelchair propulsion on a ramp. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24:495-7.
  9. van der Woude LH, Dallmeijer AJ, Janssen TW, Veeger D. Alternative modes of manual wheelchair ambulation: an overview. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:765-77.
  10. Kirby RL, Adams CD, MacPhee AH, Coolen AL, Harrison ER, Eskes GA, Smith C, MacLeod DA, Dupuis DJ. Wheelchair-skill performance: controlled comparison between people with hemiplegia and able-bodied people simulating hemiplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:387-93.
  11. Kirby RL, Ethans KD, Duggan RE, Saunders-Green LA, Lugar JA, Harrison ER. Wheelchair propulsion: descriptive comparison of hemiplegic and two-hand patterns during selected activities. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78:131-5.
  12. Burns AS, Ditunno JF. Establishing prognosis and maximizing functional outcomes after spinal cord injury: a review of current and future directions in rehabilitation management. Spine 2001;26:S137-45.
  13. Kawada K, Yamamoto S. Motion analysis of driving wheelchairs with lower legs of hemiplegic patients. J Exer Physiol. 2008;23:789-93.
  14. Mitsuhashi R, Sasaki A, Kinjo M. Kinetic analysis of one foot wheelchair propulsion characteristics according to seat surface angle of the wheelchair for stroke patients with hemiplegia. Bull Grad School Health Sci Akita University. 2013;21:113-24.
  15. Charbonneau R, Kirby RL, Thompson K. Manual wheelchair propulsion by people with hemiplegia: within-participant comparisons of forward versus backward techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1707-13.
  16. Suzuki T, Fukuda J, Fujita D. Effects of forward tilt of the seat surface on trunk and lower limb muscle activity during one-leg wheelchair propulsion. J Phys Ther Sci. 2012;24:287-90.
  17. Saito Y, Masatomi M, Yoshinaga T. Relation of posture and independent mobility in wheelchair foot propulsion. Kawasaki Med Welfare J. 2006;15:521-8.
  18. Buck S. Wheelchair propulsion by foot: assessment consideration. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;11:68-71.
  19. Murata T, Asami T, Matsuo K, Kubo A, Okigawa E. Effects of wheelchair seat-height settings on alternating lower limb propulsion with both legs. Assist Technol. 2014l;26:151-6.
  20. Wong J, Seu M, Kieran O. The effects of changing wheelchair seat position on posture and wheelchair propulsion performed unilaterally with the arm and leg. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1340:b9.(abstract)